Free the Lyrics

I just read an article published at Slyck by Nick Parker on January 12, 2006: Filesharing: The Facts and the Myths. If I had found it months ago, I could have joined in the conversation in their forums. But as it is, that thread was locked, so I’ll respond here.

It’s amazing how there can be such discrepancies on such a simple statement of fact (and I’m referring specifically to United States law) - Is copyright infringement via P2P a criminal offense or just civil? Nick from Slyck says it is just civil. (FYI: explanation of criminal vs. civil)

I am not a lawyer, but I disagree with Nick. In the forum thread I referenced earlier, there were a few voices that cried foul, but for the most part, everyone was left believing file sharing is only a civil offense when there is no financial gain since people share files for free in P2P. Here’s what I know about this, and hopefully someone can either back up or refute what I’m saying.

• So far the RIAA has been filing civil lawsuits, but it doesn’t mean criminal charges aren’t a possibility for other cases.
• Title 17 of the United States Code Chapter 5 Section 506 states how there can be criminal punishment for both commercial and non-commercial copyright infringement. In situations where there’s no personal gain, it’s still a crime as long as the retail value of the copyrighted works exceeds $1,000. Also refer to the change made in Chapter 1 Section 101, which states: “The term ‘financial gain’ includes receipt, or expectation of receipt, of anything of value, including the receipt of other copyrighted works.“
• It is because of the No Electronic Theft (”NET”) Act of 1997 that much of the verbiage was added to indicate non-commercial infringement was also a crime.
• That change in law was a direct response to the court decision in United States v. LaMacchia (1994), in which an MIT student won the case against him because the file sharing he was doing was non-commercial. The infringement in this case was computer software, but still can be relevant to all file sharing.

So, in conclusion, before the NET Act, you could argue that non-commercial copyright infringement was not a criminal act, but current law makes it so.

Edited to add:
News broke today at CNET News.com that U.S. Congress has drafted a bill to further tighten copyright law, and the federal government’s power to enforce it. Read more… Congress readies new digital copyright bill

In March 2006, the MPA issued a statement in which they explained their position on websites that distribute unauthorized sheet music and tablature.

http://www.mpa.org/news/show/5

Several points are made in the statement.

• MPA members invest a significant amount into arranging, engraving, editing, marketing and distributing sheet music products, and illegal tablature cuts into their sales.
• Sharing the tabs is bad enough, but even worse is when sites make money off the illegal tabs.
• Guitar tabs do not circumvent copyright laws just because they’re claimed to be personal interpretations.
• Viewing illegal tabs is equivalent to stealing sheet music from a store.
• The MPA isn’t targeting authorized websites, and will work with sites that want to build a legitimate business.