An article that summerized the RIAA’s wrongdoings and explains how they choose to violate their customers.
read more | digg story
This digg link isn’t related to the lyrics/tab crackdown, but I wanted to comment about it.
I don’t automatically dismiss a digg submission just because it’s a blog. Some of them have useful information or opinions. This particular link at keyBlog() has neither, is overly long and incongruous, and even worse has some inaccuracies.
“allowed Sony to search through user’s hard-drives for any files”
Where is the proof of this claim? Mark Russinovich, who reported technical details about the rootkit, described how it phoned home with an ID to check for album art updates, but nothing about scanning the computer for files. Read here: Mark’s Sysinternals Blog
That’s just one example. I can nitpick about a bunch of other minor points.
“Eventually Napster was challenged by the RIAA and lost in court and in front of the Senate.”
How does one “lose” in front of the Senate? Shawn Fanning testified in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee as part of an overall discussion of the “Future of Digital Music” Read here: Napster Goes to Washington
Notice what I’m doing. I’m citing references. Something the blog post at keyBlog() should do.
Overall, not worthy of a digg, but not bad enough to report as lame.